Maine has dilemma with gambling expansion bill

Uncategorized

Casino-oTo inflatewagering in the Pine Tree State, Maine State faces a plenty of snags now that a notice has been filed.It has two casinos now, one possessed byPENN (Penn National Gaming Inc.) in Bangor, and the other is the Oxford Casino that was utterly sold in initial 2013 for $160m by private owners toCHDN (Churchill Downs Inc.).
Risk to harness racing being presented at Scarborough Downs is themajordifficulty thatlegislators must face. However, to set up slot machines, a slight move that is sturdilydivergent by the most casino owners, a bill would provide acceptability to the harness track operator with an ease.
However, the owner of Scarborough Downs, Sharon Terry talks aboutdirecting 125 days yearly will end without slots revenue yoke racing. And that would dispense the state with only around 25 days of quick racing.
Terry also says that her business has fallen off about 21.8% with the inaugural of the Bangor Casino.
Dealing with the Houlton Band`s leaders of Maliseets is the second problem for them.And Tribe and the famous Passamaquoddy Tribe are looking to install table games and slot machines at their facilities. However, in the USA, there arenumerous states where online casinos have been accredited, Indian tribes have opened gaming operations and negotiated gaming compacts similar to commercial establishments for the betterment of the company.

The operators of Maine casino say approval of gaming growth would merelytransfer money from one casino to another casinoand eventually assist no advantage to the state in the long run.

Nonetheless, they also notice that casinos are on the depiction board of adjacent to Massachusetts and New Hampshire, which makesendurancethat, more problematic and should gambling be expanded more and more in Maine.

Benefit from casino revenues was apparent for Linking in the antagonism are the selected officials of the communities.

No Comments